Tulane Law School
About Admission & Financial Aid Student Life Programs Faculty Library Employers & Careers Life After Law School News
Sports Law

The Tulane Law School Sports Law program provides students with the background necessary to understand and handle problems unique to the sports industry.

Tulane Sports Law Blog

Alumni Profile: Warren Zola

 Permanent link

Alumni Profile: Warren Zola

Warren Zola 

MBA, Boston College, 1996
JD, Tulane University Law School, 1992
BA, Hobart and William Smith College, 1989

Twitter: @WarrenKZola 


Book: Sports for Dorks: College Football (2011)
Wrote a chapter for this book, edited by Mike Leach, which aims to address the information needs of college football fans who seek a deeper understanding about the game and its intricacies. The chapter contributed is titled “Understanding the College-to-NFL Transition: The (Cautionary) Tale of Mike Williams.”
Transitioning to the NBA: Advocating on Behalf of Student-Athletes for NCAA Rule Changes, Harvard Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law, Volume 3, Number 1 (2012).


While a student at Tulane University Law School, Warren K. Zola founded the Sports Law Society before graduating in 1992. He is now the executive director of the Boston College Chief Executives Club at the Carroll School of Management. Previously, he served as the Assistant Dean for graduate programs in the Carroll School of Management at Boston College for 11 years. Zola began his career in Boston College’s Department of Athletics. He was also vice president and chief financial officer of Maguire Associates, where he first served as senior consultant. Zola became director of sales and then vice president for marketing and sales and chief financial officer of Interactive Media Solutions.
 Q & A:  

What is your job position, and what responsibilities does that entail?
    As Executive Director, I oversee Boston College’s Chief Executives Club which is among the top ranked CEO speaking forums in the world. Under the Carroll School of Management at Boston College, the Chief Executives Club brings CEOs drawn from the top echelons of their fields—thought leaders who welcome the opportunity to address an audience of their peers. My job is to recruit CEOs from around the world to come speak here in Boston, while maintaining ties and strong relationships to the business leaders of our area.

    The other part of my job is my work in the area of sports—teaching both Business of Sports and Sports Law at the business school, as well as serving as the Chair of Boston College’s Professional Sports Counseling Panel (PSCP). In my role for the PSCP I work with those student-athletes at Boston College who have a chance to enter the professional leagues; helping them navigate that process. With over 20 Boston College former students in the NFL, another 20 in the NHL, and alumni in the NBA, MLB, MLS, women’s and men’s European basketball leagues, and various track and field athletes, the experiences have been quite varied.

How would you describe a typical work day?
    Most of my daily work revolves around speaking with business leaders—both locally and nationally—as I ensure the organization maintains its status as a world renowned speaking forum. It’s a symbiotic relationship; if we can attract visionary CEOs leading major firms to speak, the audience will be full of Boston’s business leaders. If the Boston business community gathers in a single room, we can recruit global CEOs to share their thoughts on leadership and business.

What are the best and worst parts of your job?
    To be honest, there are no bad parts of my job. The best part of my non-sports job is easy—the ability to meet and learn from some of the most interesting, successful men and women in the business world. In the realm of sports, working with student-athletes from the time they hit campus and watching them enter and then succeed in professional sports, while maintaining a tie to BC is tremendously satisfying.

What made you want to work in sports law?
    As a fan, I always was fascinated by the business and law of the industry. What decisions and laws shaped athletics, and primarily pro sports leagues, into what we all enjoyed? This fascination led me to want to learn more about the industry, and then get involved if I could. I’m still a fan, still fascinated by business decisions that impact our understanding and enjoyment of sports. And I’m still learning.

What inspired you to start the Tulane Sports Law Society, and how have you seen it grow?
    It was obvious to me that there was an opportunity to leverage the reputation of Tulane in the field of sports law because of Dean Gary Roberts—a renowned expert in the field. By co-founding the Sports Law Society, and becoming engaged, we were able to raise the public’s perception of Tulane Law as one of, if not the best, schools in this field. And as the Tulane Sports Law Society would establish itself, the brand would resonate with future employers, prospective students, and hopefully attract more faculty to New Orleans which it obviously did in Professor Feldman.

How did Tulane help prepare you for your career?
    I loved law school in general and Tulane in particular. While I never wanted to be a traditional “lawyer” the opportunity to learn how to effectively reason, communicate, and use the law have all greatly enhanced my professional life. And, by staying involved in the Tulane Sports Law Society has also played a role in my ongoing networking in this field. 

What do you think is the biggest issue in sports law/business today?
    In broad terms, it continues to be the battle between the workers and employers. You see it at the college level where the NCAA and students athletes are debating rights. You see it at the pro level with CBA negotiations and the power of the Commissioner. The battle between workers and employers over how to share growing revenue has been, and will continue to be, at the heart of virtually all major sports law and business issues of consequence.


Hot Topics in NCAA Athletics: Time for Change?

 Permanent link

In honor of the Final Four coming to New Orleans this weekend, the Tulane Sports Law Program is proud to present a panel discussion of the pressing issues facing collegiate athletics. The panel discussion will begin at 1 pm on Friday, March 30th and run for approximately one hour and 15 minutes. Immediately following the panel discussion, there will be an informal reception until 3 pm. The event will be held in room 257 of Weinmann Hall (the law school building, located at 6329 Freret Street) and is open to the public.

The distinguished panelists are:

Renee Gomila, Associate Director of Enforcement, NCAA
Timothy Epstein, Partner, SmithAmundsen
Greg Byrne, Director of Athletics, University of Arizona
Mike Alden, Director of Athletics, University of Missouri
John Long, Director of Compliance, Southeastern Louisiana University

NCAA Panel poster

Alumni Profile: Jim Aronowitz

 Permanent link

Alumni Profile: Jim Aronowitz

Jim Aronowitz Biography:

Jim Aronowitz graduated from Tulane University Law School in 1998 with the sports law certificate. After practicing at two Atlanta firms, he joined the Collegiate Licensing Company (“CLC”) in 2004, where he is currently Associate General Counsel. CLC represents nearly 200 colleges, universities, bowl games, and athletic conferences, as well as the NCAA, Bowl Championship Series, and The Heisman Trophy Trust. The company was acquired by IMG in 2007 and is now a division of IMG College, the nation’s leading collegiate marketing company. Jim oversees CLC’s trademark enforcement efforts, negotiates license agreements, and provides counsel to CLC’s staff and partner institutions.

J.D., Tulane University Law School, ‘98
B.A., Political Science, The Johns Hopkins University, ‘94

Questions and Answers:

What was your favorite non-sports law class and/or professor at Tulane? And Why?

I enjoyed Professor Fontham’s Evidence class. He made what could have been a mundane class very interesting. I always looked forward to his lectures. Professor Friedman is also a favorite. He expected a lot from his students and pushed us to think and argue like lawyers.

What was your favorite thing to do in New Orleans?

I loved living in New Orleans and try to get back at least once a year. During law school, I enjoyed heading down to the Quarter, grabbing lunch at The Gumbo Shop, and just walking around. I definitely took advantage of all the great food the city had to offer.

What's your fondest law school memory?

Meeting my future wife on the first day of law school.

Why did you choose Tulane?

Before heading to law school, I knew I wanted a career that combined my passion for sports with the practice of law. Tulane’s Sports Law Certificate program was very well-known and I wanted to participate in the program. It provided a broad curriculum that covered many areas of the law that affect the sports industry.

What are the ways in which Tulane helped to prepare you for your career? Which courses and professors were the most important for you?

Law school teaches you how to spot issues and analyze them in a certain way. Tulane helped prepare me to think like a lawyer when I hit the “real world.” The course that was most impactful to me was Professor Lunney’s IP class. In taking that class I realized I wanted to practice trademark law and get involved with licensing in the sports industry.

What made you want to work in sports law?

I have been a life-long sports fan and decided at a relatively early age that I wanted a career in the sports industry. I was also interested in practicing law and believed that it would be a good basis for a career in sports. Initially, I wanted to be a sports agent; however, I later determined that being an agent was not for me. As I made my way through law school, I found that sports trademark licensing was a great way to combine all of my interests.

Describe your career path.

As I started law school, I very much wanted to be a sports agent. I worked for one agent in New Orleans the summer after my first year at Tulane and another in Chicago after my second year. While I enjoyed the experiences, I also learned that I was not meant to be a sports agent. However, during that second summer, I worked on an athlete endorsement deal. The transactional nature of the work interested me and I caught on to trademark licensing. After my internship ended that summer, I returned home to New York before my third year began and set up informational interviews with attorneys at MLB Properties, NFL Properties, and NHL Enterprises. After those meetings, I knew I wanted to get involved with sports trademark licensing.

Upon graduation from law school, and for the next six years, I worked at two law firms in Atlanta, with a focus on commercial litigation. I realized the importance of networking to create opportunities and met with many attorneys in Atlanta who focused on IP work. I also met regularly with two attorneys at CLC, who are now my colleagues. When an opportunity at CLC presented itself, they already knew me and knew of my strong interest in the position. I am now in my eighth year at CLC and enjoying the work immensely.

What is your role within the Collegiate Licensing Company?

Brand protection is the foundation of our partner institutions’ licensing programs, and CLC devotes significant resources to this important element for effectively managing these programs. My primary role is to oversee our trademark enforcement efforts. I address a number of infringement and counterfeiting matters on behalf of our partner institutions and also resolve contract breaches with licensees. I also work closely with NFL, NBA, NHL, and MLB on enforcement matters that are common to us. A good part of my day is spent advising clients, both internal at CLC and the institutions as well, on trademark related issues. I also negotiate license agreements.

How would you compare your work as in-house counsel to working at a law firm?

I do think there is a different dynamic when you work in-house, as opposed to a law firm. At a firm, you are one of several (or many) lawyers. When you work in-house, at least in my case, you are one of a few lawyers working amongst many non-lawyers. The specialized nature of our job becomes a lot more apparent. I also appreciate being involved with a business and having the opportunity to focus on both business and legal issues. To be honest, I also do not miss having to keep track of and bill time.

What is the best part of your job?

There are a lot of great people at IMG College/CLC, with diverse backgrounds and interests, and I really enjoy working with them. CLC represents more than 200 collegiate properties and working with our partner institutions on a daily basis is also a highlight. When I have the opportunity, I love getting back on college campuses. There is always a great buzz at the campuses I visit, especially when there is a game coming up. As an avid sports fan, I also enjoy attending big events such as the BCS National Championship and Final Four.

If you could give one piece of career advice to current students, what would it be?

Find a practice area you are passionate about, set a goal to find a job that feeds that passion, and develop a strategy to get that job. A lot of this comes down to networking and creating your own opportunities. It may take some time and may not be an easy process, but stay persistent (but don’t go overboard) and be determined to achieve your goal.

DeMaurice Smith Visits Tulane Law School

 Permanent link

DeMaurice Smith Visits Tulane Law School


Earlier this month, DeMaurice Smith , Executive Director of the NFLPA, visited Tulane Law School and spoke to students about the joys and challenges of representing professional football players.  The central theme of Mr. Smith's speech was that players should be viewed as people first and players second.  He suggested that such a paradigm shift is necessary at all levels of competition if we are to succeed in protecting the health and safety of those who play the game of football. 

"Part of the problem is that everyone in the system starts by thinking of the players as athletes first. That is the wrong starting point. An athlete is a person first. When you start there, it changes the way you think about everything."

Following Mr. Smith's speech, he answered a lengthy round of hard-hitting questions from students and graciously continued the discussion at a reception following the event.  Thank you once again to Mr. Smith for taking the time to visit with members of the Tulane Sports Law Program.

Click here to see more photos.

Alumni Profile: Tandy O’Donoghue

 Permanent link
Alumni Profile: Tandy O’Donoghue

WWE Sportslaw
From Left to Right: Woody Johnson (Owner, NY Jets), WWE Superstar Triple H, John Mara (President, NY Giants) Following a press conference announcing that WrestleMania XXIX will take place at MetLife Stadium.

Tandy O'Donoghue graduated magna cum laude from Tulane University Law School in 1997 with a certificate of specialization in Sports Law, and obtained her BS in Industrial and Labor Relations from Cornell University in 1994.  She is currently the Senior Vice President of Operations & New Business Development for WWE, Inc. (World Wrestling Entertainment), where she supports various strategic initiatives for the company.  This includes WWE's content distribution efforts, such as its "original content" partnership with YouTube that launched in February 2012, as well as WWE's interest in potentially launching a television network.

Prior to WWE, Tandy worked for the USTA (United States Tennis Association) for five years, most recently as Managing Director, Business Affairs, Professional Tennis.  In that capacity, she was responsible for negotiating and managing many of the television, sponsorship and other commercial relationships for the US Open, the world's largest annually attended sporting event.  Prior to the USTA, O'Donoghue spent three years at the WTA Tour in roles of increasing responsibility, most recently as Chief Legal Officer and Head of Television. 
Tandy began her career as an associate in Proskauer Rose LLP's litigation department in 1997. While at Proskauer, she worked with a number of clients in the sports industry, including Major League Soccer, the NHL, the NBA and the ATP World Tour. 

A native of Connecticut, Tandy currently resides in Darien, a short drive from WWE's Stamford, Connecticut headquarters.

J.D., Tulane University School of Law, '97, magna cum laude
Certificate of Specialization in Sports Law
Order of the Coif
B.S., Industrial & Labor Relations, Cornell University '94

Questions and Answers:

What was your favorite non-sports law class and professor at Tulane? And why?

If you told me before my first day as a 1L that my answer would be "Civil Procedure with Professor Friedman", I would have thought you were crazy, but looking back, that was indeed my favorite non-sports class.  Professor Friedman had quite a reputation for running a very tough class, and going in, I was petrified.  He didn't disappoint (and I mean that in a good way).  Sure, he was demanding (and rightly so) - but he really taught our class how to think critically through every single issue from its core.  Even though I no longer serve in a legal role, that's a skill I continue to use in my career every day:  taking an opportunity (or a problem), breaking it down into discrete elements, thinking through each element and developing a strategy to address each element (and the opportunity as a whole) in the most effective order.  Friedman, Pennoyer & Neff, LLP - the "must hire" firm for 1Ls.     

I also have to mention Trial Advocacy and Jim Cobb.  Great experience, great learning environment, and fantastic interaction with practicing attorneys and judges.  And Jim Cobb?  A quintessential New Orleans character.  Enough said.

What was your favorite thing to do in New Orleans?

Besides eat?  Probably walking my dog in Audubon Park, right around the middle of spring semester - when the weather was perfect and the days were getting longer.  That, to me, is the magic of New Orleans - it's the only place I know that takes the mundane and makes it spectacular. 

What's your fondest law school memory?

There are many…but one that I recall vividly was a phone call I got in late July after my first year.  It was the Managing Editor of the Law Review letting me know that I had graded on.  That was a big deal to me - I worked very hard to make Law Review and remain grateful for that experience.  From the time I was an upperclassman in college, I had Proskauer Rose in my sights and I wanted to give myself the best possible chance to work there.  Law Review was a piece of that puzzle.

Why did you choose Tulane?

I chose Tulane because it was the only law school at the time that offered a true sports law program.  I know that other law schools have developed sports law programs since then, but I continue to believe that Tulane's program offers the most comprehensive and nationally respected leadership and curriculum.  Once I decided to attend Tulane, I never looked back, and I would proudly make the same decision today.

Describe your career path:

I had the good fortune of starting my career at Proskauer Rose LLP, where I was trained by incredibly smart, talented, and savvy lawyers who took a real interest in developing new hires.  I was also lucky to be a litigator during an active period of sports litigation, and had the benefit of working on some cutting-edge cases for Proskauer's sports clients, including Major League Soccer.  I had my sights set on Proskauer from very early on, given the firm's reputation in the sports law field, but I think it's important to note that it wasn't just the work or the clients that drew me to Proskauer - it was also the culture, a sense that I could really be myself there, a sense that my personality (sometimes described as…animated) would be embraced.  And it was. 

That start at Proskauer gave me the confidence to throw my hat in the ring during my fourth year when I learned that the WTA Tour (the women's professional tennis tour) was looking for a new general counsel.  I went through the interview process and lucked my way into the job (the organization ran on a tight budget, and since I was willing to take a big pay cut, I think my price was right!).  My time at the WTA Tour was fantastic - for a junior lawyer, I think few opportunities rival that of working at a smaller organization with broad reach.  The legal department consisted of…me.  So, I worked on everything from television rights deals, to player discipline issues, to the anti-doping policy, to corporate governance, to prize money negotiations with tournament owners.  The three years I spent at the WTA Tour not only gave me tremendous hands-on experience, but it also helped me get a real feel for the type of work I enjoyed (creative deal-making) and put me in a position to move on to a new role at the USTA supporting the US Open (one of the four Grand Slam tennis tournaments and the largest annually-attended sporting event in the world).

I spent five amazing years at the USTA and during that time, I formally shifted from a legal role to a business affairs role.  That's the path I wanted to take - but it isn't for every lawyer and shouldn't be.  I've had many colleagues over the years that prefer being on the legal, advisory, and risk-management side of the business as opposed to the deal-driven side of the business.  It's a matter of figuring out what you're more passionate about and what you'll enjoy doing.

At the USTA, I found myself leading various projects and deals that required a lot of collaboration and coordination across departments.  Developing those leadership skills helped me take on various strategic planning assignments and what are best described as "chief of staff" responsibilities for the CEO, including handling industry communications and leading the USTA's relationship with NYC's City Hall (the USTA is party to a long-term lease with the City of New York for the home of the US Open - the USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center).

All of the interesting legal, business affairs, strategic planning, and "miscellaneous" experience I had at Proskauer, the WTA Tour, and the USTA turned out to be just the right mix of what WWE was looking for in filling a business development and operations role in early 2010 when I joined the company.

If you could give one piece of career advice to current students, what would it be?

Nothing rings truer to me than something I read in an interview with Nancy Dubuc, the President & General Manager of Lifetime and History Networks and one of the most powerful and successful people in the television industry.  She said "pick your boss, not the job."  I can't think of a single thing that has contributed more to my career than working for people who took an interest in my development and growth, challenged me, inspired me, and generally made me feel good about going to the office.  Over time, I've learned more about the kind of boss I work with best (the "click" factor), and more about the kind of boss I need to avoid (the "definitely don't click" factor).  I would encourage students to keep that in mind as they're starting out.

What do you think a law student's biggest misconception may be about practicing sports law?

High-profile handshaking by day and courtside seats by night.  If that's the reason you want to work in sports law, you may want to reconsider your options, or prepare to be disappointed. 

"© 2012 WWE.  All Rights Reserved."

'Notional' Letter of Intent: College Football Offers More Than It Can Deliver, Part 3

 Permanent link

"Notional" Letter of Intent: College Football Offers More Than It Can Deliver, Part 3

Written By: Justin N. Fielkow

This is the third of a three-part series analyzing the National Letter of Intent system and the concept of oversigning in major college football. In Part One, I provided a general introduction to the history and rules governing the National Letter of Intent and the doctrine of oversigning in college football. Part Two analyzed the legal implications of and potential remedies for oversigning, including a promissory estoppel cause of action and breach of contract claim. Finally, this post will scrutinze the ethics and morality of oversigning as it relates to the current world of big-money college football and the impact the practice has on student-athletes.

Ethics of Oversigning

Big-money college football is a broken system. The application of the rules and regulations passed by the NCAA are rife with hypocrisy. Institutions and their coaches clearly operate under different standards than those expected of the student-athletes who fuel the behemoth that is college football. In 2010, the NCAA suspended University of Georgia receiver A.J. Green four games for selling his jersey.1  While Georgia's athletic department is allowed to sell that same jersey to profit the athletic department, Green was ruled ineligible. Meanwhile, 25 different players were arrested and subsequently punished to varying degrees in the short time that Urban Meyer was head coach at the University of Florida.2  In many circumstances, an institution would deem their program wildly out of control, with the blame falling directly on the man in charge, the head coach. However, with Meyer winning multiple championships during his tenure, neither the university nor the NCAA stepped in and issued so much as a public reprimand.

Further evidence of this dual standard is the ability of coaches and players to switch schools. While coaches can move about with relative ease, players are largely immobile once they sign an NLI.  Clearly, players and institutions, along with their head coaches, operate under different standards. The NCAA's "paper tiger" regulations regarding oversigning in college football reflect that imbalance.

Said Ole Miss coach Houston Nutt in 2009, "[t]here's no rule that says we can't sign 80 [recruits]. All I know is we have to have 25 ready to go in August."3  While Nutt obviously meant his statement as a joke, he is not too far off point. Schools often sign more players than they have available roster spots under the assumption that not all of the signees will qualify for the financial aid award. While in some instances this ends up being the case, often schools are left with a numbers crunch when more than 25 of the up to 28 NLI-signees qualify.5  Thus, lesser regarded signees are told there is no room for them, regardless of when they verbally committed or signed their National Letter of Intent (NLI). For example, Cameron Fordham turned down other scholarship offers, verbally committing to play for Les Miles at LSU.6  The summer before enrolling, Cameron was informed there would not be a scholarship available to him. Lacking other opportunities on such short notice, he was forced to accept an offer to walk-on at LSU and pay his own way through school.7  This situation is not always an option for many prospective student-athletes, yet coaches and universities continuously gamble with the lives of these young men by playing a recruiting guessing game.

Continue reading here... 

'Notional' Letter of Intent: College Football Offers More Than It Can Deliver, Part 2

 Permanent link

"Notional" Letter of Intent: College Football Offers More Than It Can Deliver, Part 2

By: Justin Fielkow

This is the second of a three-part series that will analyze the National Letter of Intent system and the concept of oversigning in major college football. In Part One, I provided a general introduction to the history and rules governing the National Letter of Intent and the doctrine of oversigning in college football. This post will further analyze the legal implications of and potential remedies for oversigning, including a promissory estoppel cause of action and breach of contract claim. Finally, Part Three will put the ethics and morality of the practice of oversigning, as it relates to the current world of big-money of college football, on figurative trial.

Enforcing Verbal Commitments Prior to Signing an NLI

As discussed in Part One, oversigning is defined as "the act of accepting more letters of intent on National Signing Day than you [an institution] have room for under the 85 scholarship limit." As a result, the unlikely-to-contribute players at the bottom of an incoming class are asked to "grayshirt," dutifully delaying their enrollment (or paying their way for a semester), until there is room for them in the next class, regardless of what a coach promised them during recruitment, or the fact that they signed an NLI. Additionally, every year thousands of high school seniors find themselves scrambling for scholarships after coaches rescind non-binding scholarship offers because they found more talented players and are forced to comply with the NCAA's signing limits.

Continue reading here... 

'Notional' Letter of Intent: College Football Offers More Than It Can Deliver, Part 1

 Permanent link

"Notional" Letter of Intent: College Football Offers More Than It Can Deliver, Part 1

By: Justin N. Fielkow

This week, young men across the country signed their National Letters of Intent, a momentous occasion and tremendous achievement in their lives. Unfortunately, for some, both the process and the conclusion will not be what they envisioned. This is the first of a three-part series that will analyze the National Letter of Intent system and the concept of oversigning in major college football. This post will provide a general introduction to the history and rules governing the National Letter of Intent and the doctrine of oversigning in college football. Part Two will then analyze the legality and potential remedies of oversigning, including a promissory estoppel cause of action and breach of contract claim. Finally, Part Three will put the ethics and morality of the practice of oversigning, as it relates to the current world of big-money college football, on figurative trial.

Introduction to Oversigning: How It Works and How It Fails

With nothing more than a wish and a prayer that a university will honor its scholarship offer to a prospective student-athlete, countless young men, such as Elliot Porter, have their verbal commitments vanish into thin air due to the unsavory practice of oversigning.1  Elliot Porter received a scholarship offer to play football at Louisiana State University in the summer of 2009. In July, Porter was one of the first verbal commitments to LSU's 2010 recruiting class.2  In February 2010, Porter signed a National Letter of Intent (NLI) with LSU, qualified academically, enrolled early, reported to summer school in June 2010, and started taking classes.3  Yet, after misjudging how many of his academically shaky signees would qualify and reaching the maximum 25-new-player scholarship limit, head coach Les Miles informed Porter that there was no room for him on scholarship at LSU.4  Porter was granted a release from his Letter of Intent and instead accepted a scholarship at the University of Kentucky.5  Porter disliked Kentucky and returned to LSU, where he is now a walk-on paying his own way for two years before he can finally get the football scholarship LSU promised him as a high school senior.6

Porter's situation is not unique. Often, the unlikely-to-contribute players at the bottom of an incoming class are asked to "grayshirt," dutifully delaying their enrollment (or paying their way for a semester), until there is room for them in the next class, regardless of what a coach promised them during their recruitment or the fact that they signed an NLI. Additionally, every year "thousands" of high school seniors find themselves scrambling for scholarships after coaches simply rescind non-binding scholarship offers because they found more talented players and are forced to comply with the NCAA's signing limits.7

Continue reading here... 

National Baseball Arbitration Competition – Information and Schedule

 Permanent link

National Baseball Arbitration Competition – Information and Schedule

Next week, the Tulane Sports Law Society is hosting the 5th annual National Baseball Arbitration Competition.  Forty teams from law schools across the country will compete in the unique and specialized context of MLB's salary arbitration proceedings.  The two-day competition begins Thursday, February 9th and culminates on Friday afternoon with the championship round and symposium, both of which are open to the public.

The championship round of the competition will be held on Friday, February 10th from 2:00 to 3:15 pm.  Following the competition, from 3:30 to 6:00 pm, there will be a symposium featuring two panel discussions. The first panel discussion - The New CBA: Change and Continuing Peace - will be held from 3:30 to 4:30. The second panel discussion - Hot Topics in Baseball: International Issues, Arbitration Today, and More - will be held from 4:40 to 5:50. The symposium concludes with final remarks by Professor Gabe Feldman. 

Both events will be held in the Kendall Cram Lecture Hall of the Lavin-Bernick Center, located on Tulane's uptown campus.

The lineup of guest arbitrators and panel members for the competition includes:

Nona Lee, Senior Vice President and General Counsel of the Arizona Diamondbacks. 
Jon Fetterolf, Partner, Williams & Connolly LLP in Washington D.C.
Larry Silverman, former Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Pittsburgh Pirates.
Darren Heitner, Attorney, Wolfe Law Miami P.A.; Chief Editor, SportsAgentBlog.com.
Jorge Arangure Jr., Senior Writer, ESPN The Magazine.
Marc Kligman, Baseball Agent, Total Care Sports Management.
Bryan Minniti, Assistant GM of the Washington Nationals. 
Steven Fehr, Outside Counsel to the MLBPA.
Scott Shapiro, Agent at Praver Shapiro Sports Management.
Jay Reisinger, Partner at Farrell & Reisinger, LL
Clark Griffith, Attorney; AAA Arbitrator; former Owner and Executive Vice President of the Minnesota Twins and former Chairman of Major League Baseball Properties.

Tulane National Baseball Arbitration Competition

 Permanent link

Tulane National Baseball Arbitration Competition

The Tulane National Baseball Arbitration Competition is less than two weeks away.  TJ Henry, who is responsible for organizing the competition, was recently interviewed about the competition by Hardball Times.  You can listen to the podcast here: http://bit.ly/zZ3Qon.

Every year, the Tulane Sports Law Society puts on a moot MLB arbitration competition where law students from across the country argue simulated salary-arbitration cases. Like law school moot court competitions, the National Baseball Arbitration Competition's main goal is to provide participants with the opportunity to sharpen their oral and written advocacy skills. The competition, however, is unique in that it allows law students to sharpen these skills within the specialized context of MLB's salary arbitration proceedings.  The competition also provides a unique opportunity to network with industry professionals who serve as arbitrators and panel members at the symposium which follows the competition.

This is a must-hear podcast for law students who are interested in competing in future years and others who want a better sense of what the competition is.

Related Links:

Academic Programs Contact:
Office of Academic Services
Weinmann Hall, Suite 204
6329 Freret Street
New Orleans, LA 70118
tel 504.865.5935
fax 504.862.8373

Admission Contact:
Office of Admission
Weinmann Hall, Suite 203
6329 Freret Street
New Orleans, LA 70118
tel 504.865.5930
fax 504.865.6710

©Tulane University Law School | Weinmann Hall | 6329 Freret Street | New Orleans, LA 70118 | 504.865.5939    Privacy Policy
Tulane University Home
admin login